The journal is committed to promoting scientific integrity and supporting the continuous improvement of published research through transparent scholarly discussion. As part of the broader scientific ecosystem, published articles may be subject to post-publication commentary on independent third-party platforms such as PubPeer, where members of the scientific community can voluntarily discuss and critique published work.
PubPeer provides an open forum for post-publication peer commentary that is independent of the journal and its publishers. Any comments posted on PubPeer are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and do not represent the views of the journal, its editors, or its publishers. The journal does not initiate, moderate, control, or endorse discussions or opinions expressed on the PubPeer platform.
Post-publication comments should be regarded as potentially useful scholarly input. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate such comments and verify their validity independently. The publishers and editors of the journal have no involvement in the operation of PubPeer and bear no responsibility for the content posted on that website.